". Online English Teacher: RPP Bahasa Inggris Kelas 12 - Pertemuan 18

Rabu, 20 Agustus 2025

RPP Bahasa Inggris Kelas 12 - Pertemuan 18

 

📘 RPP Pertemuan 18

Satuan Pendidikan : SMA
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : XI / Ganjil
Pertemuan : 18
Alokasi Waktu : 90 menit
Materi Pokok : Analyzing Both Sides of an Issue (Pro vs Contra)


A. Tujuan Pembelajaran

Setelah mengikuti pembelajaran, peserta didik mampu:

  1. Mengidentifikasi argumen pro dan contra dari isu aktual.

  2. Menganalisis kelebihan dan kelemahan setiap sisi argumen.

  3. Menggunakan kosakata akademik (connectors, modal verbs, evaluative language) untuk menyampaikan pendapat.

  4. Menyajikan analisis isu dalam bentuk teks Discussion sederhana maupun presentasi lisan.


B. Pendekatan Belajar

Deep Learning dengan langkah: observing → questioning → reasoning → connecting → reflecting → creating.


C. Langkah-Langkah Pembelajaran (90 menit)

1. Pendahuluan (10’)

  • Ice breaking: Guru menayangkan headline berita aktual, misalnya:
    “Should TikTok be banned for teenagers under 17?”

  • Siswa diminta berdiri di dua sisi kelas: “Pro” dan “Contra” sesuai pendapat awal.

  • Guru menyampaikan tujuan pembelajaran.


2. Kegiatan Inti (70’)

🔹 Observing (10’)

  • Siswa membaca teks pendek tentang isu aktual (misalnya TikTok ban).

  • Guru menjelaskan struktur argumen pro vs contra.

🔹 Questioning (10’)

  • Siswa menanyakan: “Apa alasan yang paling sering dipakai pihak pro/contra?”

  • Guru memandu agar pertanyaan fokus pada argumen, bukan emosi.

🔹 Reasoning (15’)

  • Siswa bekerja kelompok: mengidentifikasi argumen pro dan contra dari teks.

  • Mencatat evaluasi: mana argumen kuat, mana yang lemah.

🔹 Connecting (10’)

  • Guru memberi topik baru: “Should smartphones be allowed in classrooms?”

  • Kelompok membandingkan argumen dengan pengalaman nyata di sekolah.

🔹 Creating (20’)

  • Kelompok menulis analisis 2 sisi (pro vs contra) dalam bentuk tabel + paragraf singkat (150 kata).

  • Beberapa kelompok mempresentasikan hasilnya.

🔹 Reflecting (5’)

  • Guru memandu refleksi: “Apa manfaat melihat dua sisi argumen sebelum mengambil keputusan?”

  • Siswa menulis insight di kertas kecil (exit slip).


3. Penutup (10’)

  • Guru menegaskan pentingnya berpikir kritis & objektif.

  • Menyampaikan tugas rumah: menulis teks Discussion individu tentang isu pilihan (misal AI in education, homework ban, online learning).


D. Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS)

LKS Pertemuan 18 – Analyzing Both Sides of an Issue


A. Membaca Teks Isu Aktual

Should TikTok be Banned for Teenagers under 17?

In recent years, TikTok has become one of the most popular apps among teenagers. However, there is an ongoing debate about whether it should be banned for users under 17.

Pro (For the ban):

  • TikTok can be addictive and waste teenagers’ study time.

  • Some contents are inappropriate or harmful for young audiences.

  • Too much screen time may affect mental health.

Contra (Against the ban):

  • TikTok can be educational if used wisely (learning English, tutorials, news).

  • It helps teenagers express creativity and talent.

  • Banning may limit freedom of expression.

Conclusion:
There are both advantages and disadvantages. The best solution may not be a total ban, but stricter guidance and parental control.


Tugas A:

  1. Tentukan mana argumen pro dan mana contra.

  2. Sebutkan 1 argumen pro yang menurutmu paling kuat dan jelaskan alasannya.

  3. Sebutkan 1 argumen contra yang menurutmu paling lemah dan jelaskan alasannya.


B. Analisis Bahasa

Contoh Connectors untuk Argumen:

  • Pro: firstly, moreover, in addition, one reason is…

  • Contra: on the other hand, however, some people argue that…

Modal Verbs yang relevan:

  • should, must, may, might, could

Evaluative Language:

  • dangerous, beneficial, harmful, creative, addictive, effective

Tugas B:

  1. Temukan connectors, modal verbs, dan evaluative language dalam teks.

  2. Tambahkan minimal 3 kosakata evaluatif baru dari kamus/HP.


C. Diskusi Kelompok
Topik: Should smartphones be allowed in classrooms?

📖 Model Text – Should Smartphones Be Allowed in Classrooms?

Smartphones have become an essential part of modern life, and many students bring them to school every day. The question is whether smartphones should be allowed in classrooms.

On the one hand, smartphones can be very beneficial for learning. They provide quick access to online dictionaries, educational videos, and learning apps that can support classroom activities. Students can also use them to search for information instantly during discussions, which makes learning more interactive. Moreover, smartphones can help teachers share digital materials easily.

On the other hand, smartphones may also become a major distraction. Many students are tempted to check social media, play games, or chat with friends instead of paying attention to the lesson. This can reduce concentration and lower academic performance. In addition, not all students have the same type of device, which can create inequality and even bullying.

In conclusion, smartphones in classrooms have both advantages and disadvantages. Instead of a total ban, schools should regulate their use—allowing smartphones for learning purposes while restricting them during exams or lectures. This balanced approach ensures that technology supports education without harming focus and discipline.

Pro (For)Contra (Against)
1. ______1. ______
2. ______2. ______
3. ______3. ______

Tuliskan analisis singkat (150 kata) dengan menyebutkan mana argumen yang lebih kuat dan mengapa.


D. Produksi Teks
Tuliskan teks Discussion singkat (150–200 kata) tentang topik:
“Is online gaming harmful or beneficial for teenagers?”

Gunakan struktur:

  • Issue

  • Arguments for

  • Arguments against

  • Conclusion


E. Rubrik Penilaian

Aspek yang DinilaiSkor 4 (Sangat Baik)Skor 3 (Baik)Skor 2 (Cukup)Skor 1 (Kurang)
Identifikasi ArgumenTepat & lengkap (semua sisi dianalisis)Hampir lengkap, ada yang kurangBanyak yang salah/kurangTidak mampu mengidentifikasi
Analisis Kekuatan ArgumenAnalisis kritis, logis, mendalamAnalisis cukup logis, kurang mendalamAnalisis dangkalTidak ada analisis
Bahasa (connectors, modal, evaluative)Tepat, bervariasi, konsistenTepat tapi kurang variasiBanyak kesalahanTidak menggunakan
Teks/PresentasiTersusun rapi, logis, sesuai strukturCukup rapi, ada sedikit kekuranganKurang terstrukturTidak terstruktur

Skor Akhir = (Jumlah skor ÷ 16) × 100


Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar